Talk:Bibliography of George W. Bush

Bush family Low‑importance

	Bibliography of George W. Bush is within the scope of WikiProject Bush family, a project dedicated to creating and improving content related to the Bush family. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bush familyWikipedia:WikiProject Bush familyTemplate:WikiProject Bush familyBush family articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bibliographies Mid‑importance

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

untitled[edit]

Our article on Bob Woodward says this of his books on Bush:

Woodward has been accused by some critics of being too close to the Bush administration, and some say his relationship with the current administration is in stark contrast to his investigative role in Watergate. Others disagree, however. In 2004 both the Bush campaign and the Kerry-Edwards campaign recommended his book Plan of Attack, and The New York Times said the book contained “convincing accounts of White House failures... presented alongside genial encounters with the president.”

It would seem that it's a bit hasty to call his two books "pro-Bush" then. If both the Bush campaign and the Kerry-Edwards campaign recommended the book, wouldn't that make Plan of Attack best listed as a "mostly neutral" book? --Delirium 23:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Death of a President[edit]

I'd like to dispute this being in the "anti-Bush" category. I saw it and I thought it was rather neutral. --Spencer "The Belldog" Bermudez | (Complain here) 21:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

David Hera Book[edit]

Is this a real book? I tried to remove it (several times) but somebody keeps on adding it to the page and on different sections.

It is. I did a google search for "David Hera Author Bush" and this page is the only one to come back. The rest were some other David or some other author. I don't know what link I clicked but I meant to get rid of this crap. Thanks for the help. Padillah (talk) 12:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Le politiche Americane dal 11/09/2001 ai giorni nostri[edit]

The children of America, digital book, Le politiche Americane visste dall'esterno. Link dei dettagli, http://www.webalice.it/mediaffari/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.26.1.222 (talk) 08:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Singer on Bush[edit]

Perhaps you should add the book "President of Good and Evil" by the prominent professor of philosophy at Princeton, Peter Singer, to the list of anti-Bush books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.243.254.115 (talk) 00:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A book is missing[edit]

Unless I missed it, the book "Bushshit!" is missing from the list. The full title is "Bushit! An A-Z Guide to The Bush Attack on Truth, Justice, Equality, and the American Way". Written by Jack Huberman. ^[1]

Lhamilton9 (talk) 20:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.amazon.com/Bushit-Z-Justice-Equality-American/dp/1560258101

Alert: lists of publications in Articles for deletion[edit]

Some lists of books have been added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. You can find the discussions here. RockMagnetist (talk) 22:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like an awful way to organize the content on this page.[edit]

While I can see why some may find it useful to sort content by positive/negative/neutral portrayals of George W. Bush, it seems as though such a categorization is inherently non-neutral. Who decides if a portrayal is positive, negative, or neutral? Sources are not cited on this. I think this page would be much better if it were organized instead by medium. I came to this page to see if there were any films besides Oliver Stone's W. about George Bush and it was way more difficult to determine that than it should have been. 74.110.164.141 (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The organization on this page is terrible. There should not be any such classifications. The organization should be done differently. For example, it could be done by the type of author: bush official, historian, etc. Or by date. Or by CONTENT? I support an intelligent organization of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrismaster (talk • contribs) 08:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.amazon.com/Bushit-Z-Justice-Equality-American/dp/1560258101

[1]