Talk:BigDog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Bobbruffey.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uncanny Valley[edit]

Should it be mentioned how BigDog is evoking an "uncanny valley" response in some people? Are there any studies in that regard? It'd be interesting if there were but I can't find any. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.82.92.213 (talk) 05:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there's some kind of a study of it, or even just a discussion of it in some credible publication, I absolutely think it'd be worth a mention. I don't think I quite get the "uncanny valley" response myself, but the way Big Dog's legs' movement resembles that of two pairs of human legs that have been fused with a robotic frame, facing each other... there's definitely a hint of what Warren Ellis calls the "arachnid reaction" there -- that is to say, "fear and revulsion and the disturbance of proximity to something alien", which I find quite interesting. A good reference would be an absolute requirement, though; otherwise we'll be hip-deep in original research. -- Captain Disdain (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Most of what's been written about Big Dog (and I've looked at rather a lot of it) is just blog reaction. I haven't seen much in the way of technical analysis, published papers, or patents. If anybody finds something solid, please put it in. Thanks. --John Nagle (talk) 03:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had the fortune of meeting with one of the designers who explained Big Dog in great technical detail. I'll add the information soon (just need time), but it wont be sourced, since I received all the information at a presentation.---Zachary Cohen (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can cite presentations, conferences, or speeches just fine. The point of citations is not to provide a link to the original source, but to tell people where the information is from. You can use {{Cite speech}} or {{Cite conference}} or simply format it as the MLA would have you do it. I think its:
Last Name, First Name. "Title." Location including Place, City, State. Day Month, Year.
And now you know! --Falcorian (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"And knowing is half the battle..." G.I. JOE!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.172.130 (talk) 08:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I for one definetly experienced the "uncanny valley effect" when watching the videos on youtube. Also, many of the people I have showed the videos to have reactions along the lines of, "that's creepy."

Cost[edit]

Do we have a cost or estimated cost to the design of this robot? Bear 03:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)User:Bear77

The BigDog program cost $23 million for two prototypes, and the Legged Squad Support System is budgeted at $32 million for two prototypes. That's all R&D; production costs will be far lower. --John Nagle (talk) 05:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BigDog in Popular Culture[edit]

If anyone is interested, Boston Dynamics' BigDog was the inspiration for BD-428, the robotic military quadruped in G. S. Hargrave's science fiction short story of the same name. The story first appeared in the 2012 collection, Doctor Ramani's Children and Other Stories (ISBN-10: 0615589960), and may represent one of the earliest appearances of BigDog in science fiction.

BD-428, which is actually referred to in the story as "Big Dog," is described as a fourth generation field model, having Verbal Command and Response capabilities and three distinct levels of increasingly autonomous Operational Intelligence Parameters. It's at the third level, Autonomous GPS-guided Transport Unit with Tactics Logic, that behavior suggestive of sentience unexpectedly emerges. Whether or not BD-428 has actually become sentient in the tale is largely a matter of interpretation. Such uncertainty, of course, is one of the story's central themes, and one of the central issues of the rapidly advancing fields of robotics and artificial intelligence. It's a problem that we may be addressing in the real world much sooner than most of us expect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.144.232 (talk) 03:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Popular Culture" sections for factual articles are somewhat discouraged, unless the matter is notable by Wikipedia standards. See WP:IPC. Also see [1]. --John Nagle (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robots vs. Mules[edit]

The article explains how BigDog has abilities resembling a mule; can anyone find & articulate this robot's advantages over a real mule that make it worth the high expense? 65.103.54.234 (talk) 19:36, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Th main virtue is that you can switch it off, and when switched off it requires very little energy or servicing. Mules need to be fed and watered nearly as much when not in use as they do when in action. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:51, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure how happy a real mule would be on a Chinook or pushed out the back of a Hercules with a parachute. I'd still use the money for helping the homeless or something if it was up to me. 80.2.72.186 (talk) 21:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
When you turn it into walking bomb, PETA won't piss as much.L-Zwei (talk) 05:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/features/featurecould-bigdog-be-a-soldiers-best-robotic-friend/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsdarpas-ls3-alphadog-begins-outdoor-testing/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BigDog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BigDog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]