Talk:Big Red Group

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Advert-based language and information on article for Big Red Group[edit]

Hello! I spent the last 15-20 minutes or so of my life restructuring the tone and grammar of basically the entire article to read less like an advertisement. I thought it was terrible when I got here, but looking at past revisions of the article it's clear this problem was much worse before. I've linked to my revision here, and the last revision before any serious rewriting was done here. It's clear this article was written to gain more traction for the company and its products, which is fine now because several editors have worked together to make it read much more factually and less like an advertisement. However, the information on this page is still geared towards being an ad, which is something that cannot be changed by restructuring the tone of an article. So, if anyone with more knowledge (and time) finds this topic, I (and other Wikipedians) would greatly appricate it if you could add more information and better sources to balance out the advert-ness of the article. Thanks! Pandorapaw (talk) 04:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]