Talk:Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey

Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 6, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
November 2, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
September 21, 2010	Good topic candidate	Not promoted
February 15, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
February 26, 2012	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Animation: Family Guy Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Another decent good article. Good job! --Maxim_(talk) 15:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The name of this epsiode a reference to?[edit]

Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey? Probably is. 24.233.254.51 (talk) 05:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Alley Cat[edit]

Under cultural references, consider adding the information that in the gym where Peter goes, the two trainers work out to the song "Alley Cat" by Bent Fabricius Bjerre. Bent Fabricius player is a Danish composer and funny enough, the song "Barbie Girl" (which is also used in this episode), is also written by Danish composers. 87.63.228.190 (talk) 22:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Again, lots of unsourced claims in the 'Cultural References' section, aswell as a few in the 'Production' section. The guest stars part in the infobox is not complete, nor are the references fully made out. In the lead it said the episode recieved 'mixed reviews', no it didnt, it recieved all negative.

On hold for 7 days, if the actions are completed in that time, I will do a full re-assessment. Mayhem Mario 17:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's been on hold for more than 7 days, and still no action has been taken. Failed. Mayhem Mario 16:09, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill & Peter's Bogus Journey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080105130755/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/bw/2007/0810worst.asp to http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/bw/2007/0810worst.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]