Talk:Bill Johnson (Ohio politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

committee assignments, 113th Congress[edit]

Bill Johnson is NOT listed in the 113th Congress as a member of ANY of the three committees that are listed under his "committee assignments". He IS listed on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which is an exclusive committee.74.69.11.229 (talk) 15:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Need References Not from the Campaign's Own Website[edit]

Wanting to assume good faith, the early life portion is from the subject's own campaign website and lacks, in several places, any references. This raises concerns about the neutrality of the article and possible lack of a non-neutral POV? WatchDogUS (talk) 01:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bill Johnson (Ohio politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Johnson (Ohio politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing trivial or synthetic about Johnson's comments about Scott Pruitt[edit]

RMS does not determine what's important and notable (and thank god for that)[1]. We go by reliable sources.[2][3][4][5] Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, right. Anyway, I dePOVed @Snooganssnoogans's text, fixed the quote, and removed the unnecessary bolding of Pruitt's name. I don't consider Buzzfeed to be a reliable source nor, particularly, the University of Oklahoma. Quis separabit? 17:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It appears now that the neutrality issue has been dealt with and the Qui separabit and others have done the tidying up and removal of the language that may have led to the neutrality questions. To me this now seems like the encyclopedia entry for most every other politician on Wikipedia. ZeusBeard2018 (talk) 11:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]