Talk:Bilski v. Kappos

U.S. Supreme Court cases High‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Impact[edit]

Could I kindly get some assistance from scholars in the field in writing a more complete and thorough Impact section of similar caliber to that in In re Bilski (which also needs updating)? -128.61.83.190 (talk) 04:13, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting the section started. I know I'll be keeping an eye out for the inevitable scholarly analysis of the opinion. Verkhovensky (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect[edit]

I've updated the redirect Bilski to point to this article rather than to In re Bilski. I assume this is uncontroversial. TJRC (talk) 00:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that is the correct thing to do. bd2412 T 00:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cite[edit]

the cite at the beginning of this article still has a blank for the page number. Doesn't someone have the correct cite by now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]