Talk:Binary black hole

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Final Parsec Problem[edit]

Its not actually clear what is being stated in this section. There is no mention of what the "final parsec problem" even is let alone a good explanation of it. After not explaining the problem it then tries to provide a possible solution to the problem with which the reader doesn't know what the question is that prompts the need for a solution. Someone please fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.10.247 (talk) 11:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

View stats[edit]

It is interesting to note a sudden surge of interest in this article from 15 September 2015, after the LIGO detection. see http://stats.grok.se/en/201509/binary%20black%20hole. There was a peak of 479 views on the 17th. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

‘Ringing’[edit]

Article uses the word “ringing”. twice, with neither link nor definition. A layman (e.g., me) can guess what sort of thing this might be, by analogy, but that analogical guess might be completely wrong. Please could “ringing” be defined? JDAWiseman (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, much of the modelling section is not sufficiently clear. JDAWiseman (talk) 16:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would really welcome more on ringdown. In particular, is ringdown hairy? JDAWiseman (talk) 11:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Binary black hole[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Binary black hole's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Nature_11Feb16":

From Gravitational wave observation: Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Alexandra (11 February 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves found at last". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361. Retrieved 11 February 2016.
From Black hole: Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Witze (11 February 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves found at last". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361. Retrieved 11 February 2016.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Translations[edit]

inspiral (spiralling merger orbit; spiralling collision orbit): Greek: ενδέλιξη — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:889E:3000:BCA9:FE23:B968:CFFD (talk) 22:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Binary black hole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]