Talk:Biological effects of radiation on the epigenome

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Biological effects of radiation on the epigenome is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Better suited to radiobiology or different title?[edit]

A lot of the content on this page seems quite general, and not specific to the title of "Biological effects of radiation on the epigenome". I wonder if it would be better suited to merging into Radiobiology, or slimming down to be more focused? Beevil (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Effects on developing brains[edit]

https://peerj.com/preprints/3355/

The paragraph on developing brains was based on a single pseudoscientific list of cases that has been criticised by more reputable literature and should not be considered a source. Compare the infamous Wakefield study, which used the same "review" methodology. Sage, Cindy; Burgio, Ernesto (2018-01-01). "Electromagnetic Fields, Pulsed Radiofrequency Radiation, and Epigenetics: How Wireless Technologies May Affect Childhood Development". Child Development. 89 (1): 129–136. doi:10.1111/cdev.12824. ISSN 1467-8624. PMID 28504324. is the pseudoscientific source in question, and should be deleted from the reflist, which I don't know how to do. 2A02:C7C:304B:4700:7D9E:A8CA:EC45:B16F (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]