Talk:Biophilia (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources[edit]

Additional sources:

Feel free to add more! --Another Believer (Talk) 01:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Singles[edit]

From my point of view, the singles 'Cosmogony', 'Virus' and 'Moon' are not full single releases, but a promo release accompanying the iTunes apps, that's why I see they shouldn't be placed in the infobox's singles space. Anyway, I've placed them in a new space for 'digital singles' but I believe they should not be placed anywhere because all the songs on Biophilia will be released as promo singles, and further, some of them will have full (true) single releases (see 'Crystalline'). --83.58.205.56 (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, all album tracks will be released as promo singles but only a few will get actual single treatment with video's etc so i don't think all tracks should be listed as singles. --Duphin (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, finally, no more app-singles will be released, (we don't know whether there will be more tradicional singles or not...) but according to Björk.com, 'Cosmogony', 'Virus' and 'Moon' are singles. Do you think articles should be created for 'Cosmogony' and 'Virus' since 'Moon' already has one? --Quaveren (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NYT Critic’s Notebook[edit]

Playing the New Bjork Album, and Playing Along, With Apps by Seth Schiesel, published October 24, 2011 in The New York Times. 99.112.215.159 (talk) 01:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Distributor[edit]

Article says, that the distributors are One Little Indian and Polydor Records. But as of now I saw only One Little Indian and Nonesuch Records, see for example [1]. What is correct now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndg2 (talkcontribs) 14:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the release history: One Little Indian/Polydor are for the UK, while Nonesuch is for the US and Canada. SnapSnap 16:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but Nonesuch Records should then be mentioned in the "label" section too, no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndg2 (talkcontribs) 17:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the "label" field in the album infobox? Per Template:Infobox album#Label, only the primary label should be specified in the infobox, which is One Little Indian/Polydor in this case. SnapSnap 18:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Biophilia (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Biophilia (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source 5[edit]

The link for source (5) is broken. Please add source. 2601:19B:C700:C0:0:0:0:A27C (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]