Talk:BitArmor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The BitArmor article includes external links to three online articles. The Notability guidelines for companies state that "a company ... is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources". As the external links are online magazine articles written by organizations independent of BitArmor Systems, they should count as the company's coverage in the secondary sources. Are more required for secondary sources?

Afagelson (talk) 05:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed change[edit]

I would like to expand this stub to the following article. However, as an employee of BitArmor Systems, Inc., I'd appreciate it another editor would review these changes before they are implemented, as suggested in the Suggestions for COI compliance.

--Afagelson (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After three weeks without comment, I'm assuming the proposed changes were acceptable and have implemented them.

Afagelson (talk) 04:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BitArmor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]