Talk:Bitcoin Fog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bitcoin Fog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Official link and phishing[edit]

It looks like this site may be subject to phishing attacks, and for the moment I recommend leaving off the official address until it is clear which one is real.

--Nanite (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note one IP user reported major financial loss [1]. @Deku-shrub: @Mean as custard: @Bbb23: you guys are all active users and have reverted the former link (which smells very deceptive, due to typos, and insertion by IP/new editors) in favour of the latter link. Do you know if there are any particularly reliable sources in favour of the latter link? If not, I'd prefer to have no link at all. For the moment I've requested semiprotection (update: protection was denied; then added by Mz7) as there have been many link changes back and forth. Cheers, --Nanite (talk) 22:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The DeepDotWeb link seems legit. I've not been using darknetmarkets.co but as they have no relationships with the rest of the community (and thus could intermittently phish at any time) I would not use them. I think the link should be reinstated with more citations and ongoing semi protection Deku-shrub (talk) 18:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That said, the site may be selectively scamming and is now pulled from DNStats, so I say we leave it dropped. Deku-shrub (talk) 18:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--Coinabul (talk) 16:07, 30 ASeptember 2017 (UTC)

Clearnet portal link is allowed here? I think this is trusted Bitcoin Fog link: https://bitcoinfog.site — Preceding unsigned comment added by FJ-Tang (talkcontribs) 06:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]