Talk:Black Iris (painting)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Formal analysis[edit]

I'm removing the formal analysis section as original research. The citation is to Page 21 of O'Keefe's O'Keefes : the artist's collection by Barbara Buhler Lynes and Russell Bowman which states: "Seldom did O'Keeffe make more clear her belief in the inner vitalism of nature and her association of this form with light" when referring to Jack-in-the-Pulpit No. IV (CR 718). The rest of the analysis is unsourced.Mduvekot (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.–CaroleHenson (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content removed[edit]

Large blocks of content have been removed by your edits, Missjord. As I mentioned on your talk page, you are removing content that are widely held opinions. If you wish to present an alternate opinion, the best tack to take is to add content that shows that there are multiple viewpoints.

Please also be aware that by returning your edits and not engaging in conversation is an WP:EDITWAR for which you can be blocked if you do it three times.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to help you find sources for content if you can clarify what kind of viewpoint you are seeking to promote.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]