Talk:Blair Wark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleBlair Wark is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 21, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 12, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
September 17, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
December 17, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
December 23, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Tell us about the man[edit]

Sorry to be so picky about an article that has achieved both FA and Main page status, but the Introduction is really problematic. Is this article about the man, or the award? The first sentence tells us about the VC, and nothing whatsoever about the man, except that he received it.

Blair Anderson Wark VC, DSO (27 July 1894 – 13 June 1941) was an Australian recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest decoration for gallantry "in the face of the enemy" that can be awarded to members of the British and Commonwealth armed forces.

I'm not going to make the changes myself, because there is a considerable amount of adjusting to do, and it would be better left until tomorrow when it's not on the main page.

The first sentence ought to read something like:

Blair Anderson Wark VC, DSO (27 July 1894 – 13 June 1941) was an Australian soldier who served in both the First and Second World Wars, attaining the rank of lieutenant colonel and receiving both the Victoria Cross and the Distinguished Service Order.

While the awards are highly significant, they do not tell what he was, what he did, or what he really achieved. A long explanation of what the VC is, is not appropriate to the first sentence. Amandajm (talk) 11:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the belated reply, I did not notice this post until just then. Such an introduction is appropriate and commonplace for an article on a VC recipient. The whole point about the lead, particularly the first sentence, is to address why the person is notable, then describe their life; in this case, Wark's notability comes from the award of the Victoria Cross. I see absolutely nothing wrong, or problematic, with the introduction. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 07:05, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blair Wark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blair Wark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]