Talk:Blaster Master (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBlaster Master (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 22, 2010Good article nomineeListed

SOPHIA acronym[edit]

Where is it stated what SOPHIA stands for? It isn't in the original game's manual, and if it isn't at least in another Blaster Master game's manual I'd delete it as a fan creation. Soup Blazer 13:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you press start, the pause screen reads "SOFIA THE 3rd NORA MA-01" in the center. 172.192.103.181 00:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listed in BM2 packaging, documentation
Not a fan creation, actually a creation of Sunsoft's (through their development studio hired for the project, Software Creations aka Creations UK). - chaostheorem - 06:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed spelling error[edit]

I fixed an error with this sentence; "The grenade glitch does work on the components of the Area 3 boss, but as each cube much be individually destroyed, the trick's effectiveness is largely moot."; the word "much" was changed to "must".

Fair use rationale for Image:Bm book.jpg[edit]

Image:Bm book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment as of 2009-07-22[edit]

The citation needed tag sticks out somewhat. Only other thing that comes to mind to point out is the History section: this seems like it'd be better splitting the section into Development and Reception, though development might not be the best header, it's somewhat difficult to sort out what one would call it to be honest.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Going ahead and making it a full assessment, it feels like it needs more substance before it can be B-class, but is definitely a C-class article (and a high one at that). It's off to a solid start however.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for sources on anything about "Chô Wakusei Senki Metafight"[edit]

If anyone out there can find sources regarding basic information (e.g. Plot, Reviews; likely will have to be in Japanese) about the Japanese counterpart/predecessor Chô Wakusei Senki Metafight, please find them and list them here so we can get some verifiable information about that into the article. The game was re-released in Vol. 4 of Sunsoft's Memorial Series which is, sadly, Japan-only. That may be a good place to start. –MuZemike 22:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was so pissed off by the idiotic frog explanation I sloppily copy pasted the plot from here http://home.comcast.net/~dwtjr3/metafight.html , feel free to edit and whatnot but at least now it makes close to a lick of sense! Conzeit (talk) 11:23, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great find! Remember next time not to copypaste stuff from other sites directly here; you must write in your own words. We don't want to plagiarize others' work or violate anyone's copyright claims. I went ahead and rewrote so it sounds more encyclopedic and neutral in tone and attributed the reference to the first two pages of the Japanese manual, which I'm assuming the URL you posted above is a translation thereof. –MuZemike 01:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

There are a few redlinks in the article. I am pretty sure those shouldn't be there for GAs. If the article doesn't exist, don't link to it. Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it says anything (at least in the GA criteria) about not having redlinks that could possibly be articles (or redirects) someday. However, I have seen some people at WP:FAC (and most certainly WP:FLC, which this isn't a list) oppose on the basis of having (one too many) redlinks. I mean, having a couple of redlinks does encourage easy and simple article creation. –MuZemike 19:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose. Its just an idea though. I don't know much about the rules. Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Blaster Master/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  1. Well-written:
    2. (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    7. (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Comments[edit]

This review will probably take me a week or two as real life is busier than I expected when I started, but here are a few minor issues to correct.

  • Alt text looks good
  • No disambigs
  • Refs look good
  • The first screenshot could do with a rationale update
  • "These functions include weapon upgrades as well as abilities to swim freely underwater, walk on walls and ceilings, and hover above the ground" -- shouldn't "walk" be "drive"? I thought you could only go up walls while in SOPHIA.
  • "They lose a life if their power meter runs out" could use the word "respective" to become "They lose a life if their respective power meters run out"
  • "They are given five continues which allow them to restart the game at the same level in which they have lost all their lives." --this sounds like Jason and SOPHIA. I would change it to "The player is given five continues...
  • The next sentence has a similar issue
  • I'm not a fan of the redlinks, but I don't think they necessarily need to be fixed. My opinion is if SwankWorld and Nintendo Life seem notable enough to make articles of them then they can be left. If not I'd remove it. The Blaster Master Boy redlink is arguably safe no matter what.
  • The GameFAQs and StrategyWiki external links don't add anything to the article. Please remove them.


More to come...

Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I strengthened the fair-use rationale of File:Blaster master 01.png (see here) and made the other corrections you noted above here. –MuZemike 16:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PASS - I actually had some extra time this morning and went over the article two more times. Nice work! --Teancum (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Developer interview[edit]

An article that is surely useful for the currently missing development section: Interview with the creator of Blaster Master. --Grandy02 (talk) 13:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Class assessment[edit]

Normally I don't feel comfortable just giving support, but this one is really well written. I nothing to cause it to fail WP:ACLASS. Support A-Class --Teancum (talk) 14:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also support A-class, I agree with you. I gave it a read and check-through and I see nothing that should cause it to fail the criteria. As two project members now agree, I will promote this. ---Taelus (Talk) 07:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Blaster Master. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Blaster Master. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fix over the info about development staffs[edit]

Hello, I'm Kenji Sada, another creater, team leader and main-programmer of Blaster Master.

I'd like to fix over staff info of "development" section and leave additional members' names. Please could someone give me comment about changes below and acknowledge if it is ok.

I told some circumstances to Mr.Stefan Gancer and he is showing it in his site [1]. Please refer to it if you need.

Thanks in advance, Sadakenji (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I got no objection then committed it now. Sadakenji (talk) 17:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ The History of Sunsoft – Part III: The Golden Age Part 1

use of radio activr element in vehicles[edit]

We can use radioactive element in cars in this the radiation of radioactive element gives heat energy to water than the steam of water can be use to operate electricity which we can use in cars Harsh kandera (talk) 05:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Blaster_Master_(video_game)&oldid=1206332685"