Talk:BleachBit

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on BleachBit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121110005021/http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/rank_history.php?group_id=248354&ugn=bleachbit to http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/rank_history.php?group_id=248354&ugn=bleachbit

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

so clinton email issue?[edit]

Bleachbit is now being mentioned in relation to the clinton private server email stories. should we reference that in the article? Centerone (talk) 02:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but with an eye toward avoiding original research.

I just removed a statement that "the program doesn't have that ability built into it", since there's no way from just the 25 second video clip to figure out what Gowdy really meant by "delete". True, there is no specific "delete yoga emails" feature, but the BleachBit shredding capability could be a candidate for what's really being talked about here. That of course is pure speculation (whether it's by Wikipedia or the press) until there's a better source.--NapoliRoma (talk) 22:27, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One thing we should be really cautious about is any article which uses Gowdy as their sole source. He's not exactly a reliable source when it comes to Hillary Clinton. Centerone (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. Hence the use of "claim" in my edit.--NapoliRoma (talk) 05:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

−I visited this Wikipedia page because of the Hillary connection. I see that the Bleachbit website now quotes Gowdy on their main page. I also see that a misleading partisan sentence has been added to this Bleachbit Wikipedia page, in regard to Gowdy. By stating, "without offering explanation as to how it was used to do this", it implies that there is some kind of mystery as to how it could be used to do this. Either this should be deleted or it should be expounded on as to why Gowdy should have offered an explanation of how the file shredder/wiper function was used to shred/wipe files. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.201.2.158 (talk) 22:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you look immediately above what you just wrote, you'll see where I said I removed a statement: "the program doesn't have the ability built into it". I replaced it with the "without offering explanation..." line rather than just deleting it. Why? Because, we don't know exactly what Gowdy meant. BleachBit indeed has no feature for removing specific email messages, which he implies it does, but it does have features for wiping entire disks, which he does not say anything about, but again, could be inferred. With no explicit explanation of how BleachBit was used, we can't go on inference. There is "some kind of mystery", if you will.

Speculating on what he meant, in either direction, is considered "original research", which is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Also consider, as Centerone notes above, that Gowdy himself is not a neutral source.

The statement that he made a claim, but it was not a complete description of the event, is an accurate depiction of the 25 second answer.

If you have a reliable source that explains what Gowdy meant, you should definitely add it to the article.--NapoliRoma (talk) 23:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is real easy to use, basically you just download it and run it.

https://www.bleachbit.org/

BernardZ (talk)

Definitions for non-technical users[edit]

The terms "shredding", "wiping", and "vacuuming" should be defined or replaced with a more descriptive explanation of the operations. ("What, you mean with a cloth?"). I just came to check this after reading a blog that said BleachBit uses chemical methods to make a disk unreadable. Eaberry (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of Donald Trump's tweet[edit]

What the POTUS tweets or how he misnames bleachbit is hardly content. Left here for relevance. "In tweets in June 2017, Donald Trump used the term bleached as a reference to the use of BleachBit by Hillary Clinton.^[1]^[2]"

Removed for now, unless someone can come up with a reason it should be in there.

References

^ Day, Harvey (June 21, 2017). "Hillary Clinton is under investigation AGAIN over emails". DailyMail.co.uk. Retrieved July 12, 2017.
^ "Lara Trump: Nobody in Russia Probe 'Used BleachBit or Destroyed Cell Phones With Hammers' | Fox News Insider". Insider.FoxNews.com. July 24, 2017. Retrieved July 27, 2017.

A broken reference[edit]

BleachBit#cite_note-15. Sr. Knowthing ¿señor? 02:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link to a version of the page 1. Sr. Knowthing ¿señor? 02:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Day, Harvey (June 21, 2017). "Hillary Clinton is under investigation AGAIN over emails". DailyMail.co.uk. Retrieved July 12, 2017.

[2] "Lara Trump: Nobody in Russia Probe 'Used BleachBit or Destroyed Cell Phones With Hammers' | Fox News Insider". Insider.FoxNews.com. July 24, 2017. Retrieved July 27, 2017.

[1]

[2]