Talk:Blood type (non-human)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animal anatomy Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transfusions to Humans[edit]

Can Monkey and Ape blood be given to Humans in a transfusion? Can anyone speak to that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.203.58.1 (talk) 15:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The likelyhood of blood samples matching is very low due to bigger differences in genetic code between human-ape organisms than human-human organisms (blood is also a kind of tissue with cells and its' own DNA, and it can get rejected despite the fact that both groups match, or are even identical). It is not entirely impossible, but unless absolutely necessary, this shouldn't be done at all, since human blood should be available in every hospital. 79.185.83.215 (talk) 16:36, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Evolutionary history[edit]

Any info? Imagine Reason (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Potential advertising[edit]

There was a series of anonymous edits done on 8 July 2008 by IP 91.171.3.102 that looked like potential advertising, and in any case, may well be out of date by now. I'm undoing those edits for the moment until someone with more knowledge on this subject can review it. Carolina wren (talk) 22:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bacteria blood type[edit]

According to the first sentence in the article ("Animals and bacteria have cell surface antigens referred to as a blood type") bacteria cell surface antigens are referred to as a blood type. If I understand this correct, bacteria do have a blood type. Can this be true? Any information/source to that? ColdCase (talk) 02:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Example: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1940/ apers0n (talk) 23:27, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correlation of ABO Blood Types in Primates with Human Origins (What About ABO Rodents?)[edit]

This seems an absurd assertion as anything other than a theory (rather than stated a fact as in the article), when one considers that among species of rodents are also found ABO blood type groupings.

Are people who push these half-blind assertions as facts then descended from rats?.. Let's assume it was an honest mistake, however obviously needs to be corrected.

..It's similar to the argument that because primates have 5 digits, humans therefore descend. Well, so do koalas have 5 digits, so are they the ancestors of some humans? Maybe koalas are the ancestors of Muppets! New Wikipedia fact material! I think not.

Anything can pass as a theory, but an unproven and rather illogical theory can certainly not pass a fact, regardless of reference links. Just please restate it as a theory, then it can be linked to all the amazing claims from such highly regarded, albeit highly slanted not-fully-scientific research.

By the way, with all due respect to peoples' intelligence, please don't take these comments or my light jesting as bitter sarcasm. :)

As you can see, i personally haven't made any changes to the article myself, just discussing what i feel to be a very important change, because the article is otherwise very misleading and manipulates its evidence without presenting all the facts. - i.e., Most people wouldn't buy it if they realized there's other species than humans and primates with ABO blood type groupings.

Much love — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.65.114.189 (talk) 22:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blood type (non-human). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715155155/http://www.rapidvet.com/canine.htm to http://www.rapidvet.com/canine.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Horse Blood Factor Combinations[edit]

There is a "dubious" tag on the claim that all factors can be combined in all combinations. The reference given for the horse blood types ("Equine Hematology, Cytology, and Clinical Chemistry") seems to indicate on page 42 that not all combinations are available. The table given has a list of alleles, in which not every combination is listed. I am not a veterenary hematologist, but it seems this would indicate that only those factor combinations listed are possible. Thoughts? 2601:600:4:7EFE:E152:B64C:D154:2F49 (talk) 05:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]