Talk:Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Libertarianism portal Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality[edit]

This article sums up everything bad about copying and pasting from websites, legal or not - it is not written in an encyclopaedic manner, with phrases like "commits itself to" and "warranty of scholarship excellence" being particularly wretched.--Laun chba ller 14:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the tagging. There seems to be a clear issue with going into unnecessary detail, a lack of reliable sources, and perhaps WP:UNDUE weight. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]