Talk:Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

United States courts and judges

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This court no longer exists![edit]

Although technically true that this court was renamed, it was much more than that. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is quite different in nature than the old BPAI. For example the PTAB has IPR, CBM, PGR, and derivation proceedings that the BPAI never had. In addition, the BPAI had inter partes reexam and interference proceedings that the PTAB does not have. We need to create a new page for the PTAB and clearly indicate that this one no longer exists. Speedplane (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't take this anymore... so I created a new page: Patent Trial and Appeal Board Speedplane (talk) 23:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Put in stub to get page started.--Nowa 23:31, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congress Vs. Supreme Court?[edit]

The United States Congress, however, can change laws and thus override a decision of the United States Supreme Court.

I question this, because I thought the USSC also decides on issues of constitutionality. No amount of changing laws can override the constitution (with the obvious exception of amending the constitution, a long and difficult process)

Also, the whole concept of Checks and balances is based on the idea that none of the branches of government is greater than the others —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fbarton (talk • contribs) 22:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Good question. The US Supreme Court decides questions related to the proper interpretation of a given law. This may or may not include whether or not a given law is constitutional.

If Congress doesn't like how the Supreme Court interpreted a law, they can change the law. As long as the new law is constitutional, Congress has the last word. For example:

"In 1946, the law was amended to overrule the Supreme Court's decision in Electric Storage Battery v. Shimadzu[36], which had applied the U.S. laws "first to invent" principle on a world wide basis. The statute confined the first to invent principle to situations where evidence of the invention could be found in the United States." A Brief History of the Patent Law of the United States

--Nowa 02:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unconstitutionally appointed judges[edit]

anymore news on this? why isn't it a bigger news story? ideas?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1128311

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.6.168 (talk • contribs)

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --Edcolins (talk) 07:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Appeals from BPAI[edit]

Can you actually appeal from the BPAI to a district court under 35 USC 145? The statute just says appeal to the Federal Circuit or civil suit against the director in the DC District Court, not district courts in general... Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 01:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, my reading of 141 and 145 doesn't show you can appeal a BPAI decision to anyone besides the Federal Circuit. The civil suit in the DC district court is not an appeal and I don't see how a district court can have any kind of appellate jurisdiction anyway (nor does a district court besides DC have personal jurisdiction over the USPTO or officers thereof). I went ahead and edited the appeals procedure to reflect this, but feel free to correct (preferably with sources since I'm curious to know) if necessary. Cquan ^{(after the beep...)} 11:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name Changed - Now the "Patent Trial and Appeal Board"[edit]

The name of this administrative court has changed. Should we change the name of the article? Or create a new article under the new name?

Is there a procedure for "formerly named" titles? Something like: "Patent Trial and Appeal Board (formerly Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences)" Teachingaway (talk) 19:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best way is to have the "PTAB" page include a link back to the "BPAI" page right under the Main Title. I added a sentence on the USPTO page describing the change over. If you search Patent and Trademark Office Appeals Board, you merely get redirected to BPAI. That redirect has to be eliminated also.Saltwolf (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114054438/http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/bpai/docs/bpai_org_12152008.pdf to http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/bpai/docs/bpai_org_12152008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]