Talk:Body without organs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Continental philosophy

Merge?[edit]

this is the same text as in the Anti-Oedipus article. Merge? - Ktai 18:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect statements?[edit]

I am just a casual reader of Deleuze but The second last line in the piece struck me as wrong. Specifically “the full BwO” is not the healthy BwO but is completely withdrawal or “catatonic” as described in the Routledge publication ISBN 0-415-113119 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum-9 at the top of page 33 in Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus by Eugene W. Holland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.60.21 (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you've misunderstood Holland's point. He says that when one withdraws to the full body without organs and rejects completely the desiring machines, one becomes catatonic. The relevant text is "How do you make yourself a BwO?" in Thousand Plateaus. DionysosProteus (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suitable egg images[edit]

Incomprehensible[edit]

This article needs translating into English, or possibly English-and-not-crazy. Clement Cherlin (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Least comprehensible article on Wikipedia?[edit]

Is this even notable enough to deserve an article? If it is, it certainly deserves a more understandable one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.79.108 (talk • contribs) April 2, 2012

This article is now on Reddit with the title So I think I found the least comprehensible article on Wikipedia.. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This post attempts to explain the article. --George100 (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never have I been so tempted to replace the content of a Wikipedia article with a cut and paste from a Reddit post. <smile> --Guy Macon (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]