Talk:Bojack

This article was nominated for deletion on November 21, 2005. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article was nominated for deletion on February 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was speedy redirect.

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

videogames[edit]

the article says that Budokai Tenkaichi 2 will be Bojacks 2nd playable appearance. The problem is, It lists 2 games he was playable in right above that. I'm going to delete that sentence.

Size[edit]

Someone should add a section about Bojack's size. Son of Kong

Not really. Anything about his size would be speculation, a.k.a not allowed on Wikipedia.--Koji Dude 03:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compare a picture of Bojack standing up straight to a picture of Goku standing up straight & you'll see that Bojack is anywhere from 7-9 ft tall. Son of Kong

That is speculation and Original Research, which are both very bad things to put on Wikipedia.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 20:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, compare him to the likes of Goku & tell me he isn't 7-9 feet tall. Son of Kong

You don't seem to understand. Unless you have an official source stating his height, the section shouldn't be in.--Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 00:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand. I'm telling you that since Goku is a legit 5'7 take a picture of him standing up straight & compare it to a picture of Bojack standing up straight. Son of Kong

No speculation, No assumptions, No original research. -- bulletproof ^3:16 18:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

No need to keep the article. It's just a plot summary of a character that's not notable beyond one movie. Agree or disagree? Nemu 20:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, man, it's not a bad article.--S U I T ^Halloween? 05:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The writing is fine, but as with the other movie character articles, it's just a plot summary. It would be better to take the appearance paragraph, merge it with the first paragraph in the biography setion and place it in the list. That way, we have a nice, concice understanding of him without it being too fluffy. The bottom four paragraphs go into too much detail(we don't need to list every blow delt) and would do better merged with the summary of Bojack Unbound. Nemu 20:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good explanation... Pretty much the same as the Goku Jr. article...--S U I T ^Halloween? 05:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose the merger. Bojack has enough detail for his page and doesn't appear to have fan cruft, so does Zangya. —--Power level(Dragon Ball) 19:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose as well. The current trend seems to have main movie villains having an article while henchmen are listed on the general aliens page, and I think that works fine. Onikage725

Consensus was three against one, Nemu. So, ya can't redirect it unless new consensus is reached. Power level (Dragon Ball) 00:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]