Talk:Both Flesh and Not
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Reception section[edit]
Anyone want to add some reviews here?
Here are a few:
http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blog/david-foster-wallace-essays-federer/#.Uc9h0z7g0ho http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/non_fictionreviews/9712758/Both-Flesh-and-Not-by-David-Foster-Wallace-review.html http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/ios-book-review-both-flesh-and-not-by-david-foster-wallace-8348231.html http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/books/both-flesh-and-not-by-david-foster-wallace.html http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/11/david-foster-wallaces-nonfiction-better-with-age.html http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/books/ct-prj-1104-david-foster-wallace-both-flesh-20121105,0,3614515.story
Those are just the results of a quick search, but there's a good balance of positive, middling, and negative.
Anyway, hoping someone gets to this sometime.167.165.60.108 (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)stealstrash