Talk:Bots!!

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (8 participants)
Dancing Stage Max (3 participants)
Bez-MX (9 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)
International Hobo (2 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

When was it made?[edit]

Insert non-formatted text here I think this game is fairly new, not much more than a year old. Anyway I would just like to know when it was made. March 27,07 6:14

(KC)

When is "It's strategy guide material"Go to far?[edit]

And I'm talking about what was reverted here.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BOTS&diff=136015068&oldid=135571428 Quick notice:There is no guide on the net or otherwise on the face of the earth.At least put the descriptions from the site...TheK12 02:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BOTS Q and A[edit]

I'm just a guest here. I play Bots, and I verify that it is a great game. I want to know, how do you categorize?

~SeraphimZero

I would really like to see people who are knowledgeable in this game start a game guide for it at strategywiki. This article doesn't answer too many questions about the game itself. Ex. why exactly IS Surge the hardest to level up? Maybe if there were a strategywiki article on it, then people would work to provide more info about the game. It would be highly helpful for those curious about the game, along with newcomers and seasoned players who want some tips.

Surges are hard to level since they are weak at sector.i can help with all Questions, im a lvl 61 ram X093 22:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the servers, I have been playing BOTS, but I don't see the Elite server. I am curious about that. Any confirmation about this? Tiggs 17:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, the channel International 1 seems to be Internationa1 1. Any confirmation? Tiggs 03:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

References[edit]

BOTS is being challenged as it does not have enough references.

most references can olny be found in-game and thats hard to link to isnt it?

X093 12:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the Need refrences cleanup tag.TheK12 19:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random Clean up[edit]

I ,X093 am a random unoffical patroller.

so far there has been some vandalisim caused by 24.44.218.2

Why is this happening? people seem to target popular sites/titles for vandalisim.

I dont like to see my fav game have vandals lingering around. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by X093 (talk • contribs) 17:57, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

Omfg i Apoligize in advance but-- 24.44.218.2 youre a damn bitch messin up random pages sumone gotta ban him or sum thin (i sincierly aploigize for my foul language) User:X093 20:38, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not put "Needs refrences" on this page.[edit]

Kind of hard to get refrences straight from the game. You want refrences?Look them up yourself.I googled it and all I got was just the page linking to the game. This is a pretty much "Unheard of" game,like Cubivore on the gamecube.There is no even reviews on the web.Even MMORPG.com doesn't have a description(I think).It has no reviews on there even.The only reviewers etc. that know about this is acclaim themselves.TheK12 04:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bots!!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.botsgame.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170303202255/http://www.gamespot.com/bots/reviews/ to http://www.gamespot.com/bots/reviews/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]