Talk:Brachychiton megaphyllus

A fact from Brachychiton megaphyllus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that to the speakers of the Ngan’gityemerri language, the flowering of the red-flowering kurrajong marks the time that freshwater crocodiles are laying eggs?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brachychiton megaphyllus.

Wikipedia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Northern Territory / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Brachychiton megaphyllus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Drought-tolerant trees[edit]

This article has Category:Drought-tolerant trees but that isn't mentioned anywhere in the article and is thus unverifiable. Either remove the cat or add some referenced text that backs up the claim. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:42, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, don't remember adding that but must have been me. Never mind/removed. Not much source material out there....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]