Talk:Brachyponera chinensis

Sources to improve article

• http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/11/16928308-stinging-needle-ants-overtaking-invasive-argentines-in-us
• http://www4.ncsu.edu/~bsguenar/Pachycondyla%20chinensis%20page.html
• http://www.ncsu.edu/grad/research/docs/spicer-rice-poster-2012.pdf
• http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/7987/1/etd.pdf
• http://www.livescience.com/27014-invasive-ants-battle-for-turf.html
• http://www.antmacroecology.org/robdunn/press_pachycondyla.html
• http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674902000416
• http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674905032392
• http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674999703027

Compiling a list of sources above for article improvement. — raekyt 00:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Critique for Biology 151 (Professor Hirshorn) at Montgomery College

Question: Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

The brevity of the article is obviously an issue, as it only seems to contain a lead section. However, this aspect of the article intrigues me, as it leaves room for significant contribution. The text is out of date in the way that the species is listed as an inhabitant of Maryland on marylandbiodiversity.com, though the article does not list the Old Line State among those states which host the Asian Needle Ant. Thus, including an updated map of the Asian Needle Ant's locations of occupation within the United States and abroad would prove useful to readers. In general, there is a lack of specific information regarding the means of introduction of the species to the United States, the "ecological impacts of biodiversity" caused by the ant population in the United States, or the combat between Asian Needle Ants and Argentine Ants over land, all of which are referenced in the article. There is also no mention of the dimensions of the organism's anatomy. All of the aforementioned topics could serve to lengthen and strengthen the article if they are included as main points within the body of the text.

Other Questions (Bullet Points 1,4,&6 listed on our WikiEd page for Biology 151):

All facts which are presented in the article are accompanied by cited sources. Furthermore, the article does not seem to include any copyright or plagiarism infractions to my knowledge. The links to the sources referenced in the text are functional and helpful to readers searching for more information on the Asian Needle Ant. In addition, the information provided by such sources appears to be scholarly and compelling. Summarily, there seems to be a great deal of information provided in the sources which is yet to be extracted, rephrased, and included in the article so as to provide a more accurate and complete representation of the species of interest.

Ryan Thron (talk) 04:57, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brachyponera chinensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110115054739/http://entweb.clemson.edu/urban/pachy.htm to http://entweb.clemson.edu/urban/pachy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)