Removed content[edit]

I removed the following content from the Brahmā Sahampati section; it was added by one user and to my knowledge actually refers to the Hindu Brahma. The part about the Four-faced Buddha deserves to be mentioned elsewhere, though. Paul_012 ^(talk) 09:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brahmā Sahampati, described as having four heads, has become very popular among Thai Buddhists as a deity who brings prosperity to the people. His shrines can usually be virtually seen everywhere, such as the Erawan Shrine. Brahmā Sahampati has also gathered a following amongst Chinese Buddhists, who frequently misinform him as the Four-face Buddha (四面佛).

The beginning of the sentence, "The old Upanishads largely consider Brahman..." in the last section might have a typo; is it, "...Brahma..."? I don't know but it might add clarity if it is.

Citations[edit]

Why is there no citation of sources?PoochieR (talk) 11:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tendentious[edit]

The sentence 'The Buddha confined himself to what is empirically given' is tendentious. This is part of the general effort to situate 'the Buddha' within the meta-narrative of naturalism and empiricism and can only be supported by a selective reading of the texts. Such a reading is directly contradicted by http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an04/an04.174.than.html

Buddhism is not at related to Hindus its a different religion let it be different[edit]

Buddhism is not at related to Hindus its a different religion let it be different Shravika12 (talk) 21:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]