Talk:Brain Tumor Social Media

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 June 2020 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Medicine: Society Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This has an unusual feel[edit]

I accepted this WP:AFC draft primarily because I was unable to decide on clear acceptance versus declining it. It has a definite feel of notability, yet in a limited arena. Sufficient sources exist. Even so I think others will be better judges than I, so I leave it to the community. Fiddle Faddle 13:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent, just a quick note to say thanks for getting this article out of AFC. Articles that aren't clear tend to languish because nobody wants to be labeled as "that guy who approved the bad article". When there aren't obvious problems, IMO it's better to get it into the mainspace, because that gets more eyes on it, and, if someone else decides it's not notable, then they can take it to WP:AFD and find out what the community's decision is. IMO that's the right path, so thanks for doing your part of it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WhatamIdoing, I think we all need to work this way. And as for our 'reputations' we can put a disclaimer as I have done. Reviewers cannot know everything. Nor, to be fair, can the community, but more eyes on an article are better than a single or a restricted set. Fiddle Faddle 11:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]