Talk:Brainstorming/Archives/2016

Untitled

Why could thought shower be discriminatory? And isn't this really just a definition? Exploding Boy 12:28, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)

Actually, I guess that should be, why could brainstorming be considered discriminatory? And by whom? Exploding Boy 03:43, Jul 10, 2004 (UTC)

---

That's an interesting new external link on wikis for brainstorming. I just skimmed the report, but it sounds like Wikipedia is the rare stellar example of a good wiki community. Nice. Spalding 12:02, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

Political Correctness

The political correctness section misses the point - as with all politically correct phrases, the supposed banning was not because it offended epileptics but because the idiots who dream up these politically correct ideas thought it might. 130.88.173.23 (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Political correctness is counter to brain-storming. Brain-storming is a free flow of ideas, political correctness is a censored flow of communication.(Fractalhints (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC))

Political correctness is in no way analogous to censorship. Censorship is real. Political correctness is an imagined restriction dreamt up by people who want to dare to be outspoken but are frustrated by any actual restriction.

I still have people telling me at work that "we mustn't call it Brainstorming" so clearly this is still an issue and it should be addressed here because this is the page that people will come to.

All that is needed is a brief mention that the myth was started by a Telegraph article (probably not deliberately) and link to a Political Correctness page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.150.177.249 (talk) 10:47, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

I agree. I came here looking for this info but it isn't in the article. Alex Stacey (talk) 15:44, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Me too.185.22.224.96 (talk) 15:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Me three. I still get told (once every 6 months or so) that brainstorming is 'banned' because it's offensive and everyone must use 'thought shower' instead. I came here because I was trying to find out how wide-spread the issue is and who was actually offended and I was surprised to see no mention of it in the article. 108.171.128.169 (talk) 13:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)