Talk:Brie Bella

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... Brie and Nikki are 2 separate people. --Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 01:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because The Bella Twins is their tag team name they have independent careers now as WWE has established them as singles competitors and refers to them as two individual people on WWE.com while it needs editing to refer to Brie Bella and not a direct copy of The Bella Twins they being Nikki Bella and Brie Bella are two separate people who have established their own individual careers in WWE --Adamprin (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it appears to me that enough sourced info exists to merit an article on this person. The existing topic is the article on her wrestling tag team, so it's not the same as this article. --Rockypedia (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brie Bella has NOT retired[edit]

From the source I have restored - note the bolded;

BRIE BELLA: Yes. WrestleMania 32 was my last match.
I wouldn't say my last match forever, just my last match that you'll see in a while. I am here at home because Daniel Bryan and I want to start a family soon. Or I shouldn't say soon — we want to start it now! We're going to start having babies, so I have to put my career on hold.
It doesn't mean that I'm going to be gone. I'm going to be an ambassador for WWE. But I'm going to try motherhood.
WWE.COM: So, this isn't an official retirement then, but it is more than just a break.
BRIE BELLA: Exactly.

Brie's own words, clearly stating that she has NOT OFFICIALLY RETIRED 144.126.126.210 (talk) 15:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hence, Semi-retirement. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 11:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brie Bella is retired and not coming back she said in a interview[edit]

Brie Bella talks about having her last match and ending her career in Dallas here is the link https://www.facebook.com/349800268529310/videos/634307943411873/ May 27th 7:26 pm

Go to http://www.wwe.com/superstars/brie-bella and read the description. It says she has retired from in-ring competition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:404:8101:74D0:D49C:BF9:79F3:6244 (talk) 21:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh Tyty2000 (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 May 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. SSTflyer 05:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am moving Brie Bella and Nikki Bella to Brie Bella (The Bella Twins) and Nikki Bella (The Bella Twins) respectively, to preserve history. SSTflyer 05:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]



– How does the Bella Twins now has its own individual article and some are requested to delete it? Anyway, there's no other persons have the particular name aside from those twin sister wrestler. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 18:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose as there may well be a person with that name. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 18:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Let's see if there really are other persons with that particular name. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 18:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't see any other articles titled Beie Bella so even if there are other people that share the name none of them appear to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.68.163.254 (talk) 19:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hey Kiraroshi1976 Kindly explain your side about opposing the request to move. It seems that it is fully broad. Thank you. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 07:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • As long as there are no other persons with the name, I'll support the move. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – the "oppose" vote above is a bit silly, unrelated to how we decide issues of disambiguation on WP, don't you think? Dicklyon (talk) 05:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reply That's what am I thinking. I will give him the one who oppose this the right to explain that. j3j3j3...pfH0wHz 16:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This could've easily been a technical request, since those titles already redirect to their respective articles. Prefall 08:24, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support No other Brie nor Nikki Bella that I can see. — Wyliepedia 09:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Brie Bella. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]