Talk:Brilliant Dadashova

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Azerbaijan

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Vartuhi Vardanian[edit]

Just curious, but is there a non-Azerbaijani source that confirms the information stated in this article on Vardanian? -- Clevelander 11:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

website link dead[edit]

The link to her website in the "External links" section and in the image box is dead. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Age[edit]

This person is registered with the Central Election Committee of Azerbaijan, which shows her age based on her Azerbaijani ID, which is 1959.[1] A non-partisan news website confirms this.[2] Parishan (talk) 11:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to her official website http://dadashova.com/, she was born in 1965 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Everest505 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Her official website cannot top the state website or the third-party news website which cites official information from state agencies with regard to her date of birth. Parishan (talk) 09:15, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salam Parishan.Mən pasport müğənni var. http://savepic.org/2665488.jpg Mən ilə məşğul sayı 055-784-70-49 və ya(+994557847049)zəng edəsiniz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.25.30.198 (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question, how can she have been born in 1965 when (according to the article) her mother died in a 1964 car accident? ~Adjwilley (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on birth date[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The suggestion that we cite both sources and allow the reader to judge is generally a good one, but in the face of serious doubts as to the authenticity of both of them, doubts which have not been refuted or even addressed at all, as a matter of both consensus and policy the birthdate should simply be excluded. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The birth date given on official voting rolls such as this one (translation) conflict with the artist's claims on her official page (translation). An editor who claims to be close to the artist has cited a purported image of the artist's passport to support that birth date. How should we proceed given the conflicting dates given by these sources?--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 18:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to believe the voting records. I can see how someone in the performing arts might have it in their interest to appear younger. PierceG (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We are not here to judge. Give both dates, give their sources, and let people draw their own conclusion. DGG ( talk ) 20:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't we judge? If there's a potential conflict of interest shouldn't that be taken into account? The "reliable" in "reliable sources" implies a judgment call. PierceG (talk) 23:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with DGG. Celebrities often lie about their birth year in order to appear younger than they are, so two or three birth years are common. WP should just include them all, provided they are from reliable sources. Here, the passport image is useless, since its provenance is uncertain. The artist's own web page could be used, but perhaps worded as ".. she claims to be born in.." or similar per WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV. The voting roll looks pretty darn reliable and probably should have the most weight. --Noleander (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Include both sources with the voting records as the primarily weighted date. Dreambeaver(talk) 18:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Caution. Both sources appear to fall foul of WP:OR. I would be inclined to trust neither. Andrew³²⁷ 16:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do you Know the voting record is for her? — raeky t 23:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brilliant Dadashova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.echo-az.com/archive/2005_04/1064/kultura01.shtml
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.infocenter.gov.az/v3/dislokasiya/voters_sd.php?dsk=23&menteqe=24
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008013724/http://www.copag.gov.az/er_1.shtml to http://www.copag.gov.az/er_1.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926221531/http://www.armenianow.com/archive/2004/2004/january23/arts/songfight/index.htm to http://www.armenianow.com/archive/2004/2004/january23/arts/songfight/index.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110809162257/http://www.brilliantdadasova.com/en/ to http://www.brilliantdadasova.com/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]