Talk:British Tamils Forum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bias[edit]

Article presents Tamil grievances as fact. YellowMonkey (click here to choose Australia's next top model) 04:06, 28 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Lacks Neutrality[edit]

The article reads like a newsletter of the Forum inspite of red herrings which refers to the LTTE as savage terrorists with most of it sourced from the forum and tamil net about which the article is supposed to be. The reliability of the source is questionable. Most of the article consists of quotes of statements made by the forum and its supporters. Thus sounds like a propaganda article for the forum written in third person. Gs44631 (talk) 17:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A blanket statement about the whole article is not useful. What statements are not neutral? In itself, the referencing an article about an organisation by using its website is quite normal. --Duncan (talk) 23:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because there are no specific examples of POV given, I am removing the pOV flag from this article. If we can get some references which allow us to correct any errors, then we should discuss those on this page. --Duncan (talk) 08:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]