Talk:Broken Top/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 09:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   "Bend and Crook Glaciers are the two named glaciers on the peak" - this strikes me as awkward, would it be better as "There are two named glaciers on the peak, Bend and Crook Glacier"? Up to you though.

   "making it the second-largest wilderness area in Oregon" - it would be interesting to know what the first is. Can you add it onto the end of this sentence?

   Rhyodacite is wikilinked, though not at its first mention. Rhyolite could use a wikilink at its first mention too.

   "overlapping with eruptions at North Sister" - what is North Sister? Same issue with South Sister later on

   "Edward Taylor's analysis determined" - when did this happen?

   Memorial Day is wikilinked twice

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Some of your retireval dates are more than 10 years old. It's definitely not a fail point, but I'd update them.

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Looks really good. Placing on hold until minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 11:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

@Freikorp: I think your comments have all been addressed! Thanks for the review! ceranthor 16:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Looks great. Happy to pass now. Congrats. Freikorp (talk) 01:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC)