This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
The Brooklyn Eagle was housed in the "Eagle Warehouse and Storage Co." warehouse at 28 Old Fulton St, Brooklyn, which still stands today, but was converted to residential condos in the 1970s. Directly across the street from the front entrance is a Grimaldi's Pizzeria.
Can anyone confirm that the newspaper was published from a warehouse.
The newspaper offices were at 28 Johnson Avenue, not the Eagle Warehouse. The Warehouse at 28 Old Fulton Street was where the paper's printing presses were, not the editorial offices. K72ndst (talk) 20:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article Hollow Nickel Case indicates that the message was not a welcome message, as indicated in this section. Tckma (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
How much of this article should be about the original defunct paper and how much about the successor that uses the same name? Should I link a new BE article to this page in a citation template or not? – Muboshgu (talk) 16:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article is currently about both papers, so I see no reason why you shouldn't link to it. Gatoclass (talk) 02:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. It's a bit odd with the infobox start and end dates which refer only to the initial paper though. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
