Talk:Brown College at Monroe Hill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brown College at Monroe Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brown College at Monroe Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brown College at Monroe Hill/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 03:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get this review started Kingsif (talk) 03:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Style[edit]

  • At first read, the impression is that this is poorly structured and written.
  • Extraneous wikilinks throughout
  • Was Produced by Heritage Film Project | Color and Black and White | HD | 50 min. | 16:9 copied direct from IMDb? Using lines like that is not generally accepted prose on Wikipedia.
    • The actual prose part of the awfully-named "Documentaries and Other Media" section is also poor in that it contains two things: a film synopsis and a brief sentence for relating the film to the college - which is just restating that it is Brown College on Monroe Hill at the University of Virginia.
  • The (entirely unreferenced) Activities section reads like an advertisement.
  • The timeline could easily be in prose.
  • Fail stopping before getting into detail

Coverage[edit]

  • Just from reading the one source attributing the History wall, I can see that there's a lot more on the history and the main building than the article contains. This information is in a source that's been cherrypicked for the article, why is it not included?
  • On the other hand, some of the things mentioned thereafter seem trivial. If things like the quirky essay questions and social events were expanded on, their inclusion wouldn't seem so misplaced.
  • Fail gaps

Illustration[edit]

  • The image of the buildings could surely be placed in the infobox?
  • Both infoboxes look good
  • The Monroe Hill artwork is very big, but I'm also not sure if it's necessary.
  • Needs attention

Stability[edit]

  • Good
  • Pass

Verifiability[edit]

  • The sources seem generally good, if inconsistently formatted.
  • However, there are a few dead links
  • About half the article is unreferenced.
  • The source currently [16] only establishes the titles Grand Poobah and Shama Llama Ding Dong, it does not mention anything else it is supposedly attributing.
  • Fail

Neutrality[edit]

  • Parts are very much like advertising (see above).
  • Fail

Copyright[edit]

Overall[edit]

  • This is very far from meeting the GA criteria. Kingsif (talk) 05:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]