Talk:Brownie (Dungeons & Dragons)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Primary sources[edit]

The primary sources tag is entirely relevant as the "article relies on references to primary sources or sources affiliated with the subject". The only source that might be considered not a primary source is the White Dwarf in its presentation of the brownie as a player character race since WD and TSR broke off their licening agreement in 1981. Otherwise all of the sources are published by the D&D franchise owners or are the pseudo D&D franchises talking about the game stats for the brownie within their own game world. The article therefore relies on primary sources for its content. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Avalanche Press. They are independent. I am also going to post material from Mayfair games once I get home. But as it exists right now, the article tag does not need to be there. Web Warlock (talk) 18:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Avalanche press source is not talking about anything other than the content in the Avalanche press book itself. If it were talking about the appearance and use of brownies elsewhere, then we could discuss how independent Avalanche press is. But we are not even past basic primary source. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]