Talk:Bruce Wayne (TV series)

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 August 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: DC Comics / Batman Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Batman work group.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Batman in film#Batman: Year One and Batman Beyond|Batman: Year One]] The anchor (#Batman: Year One and Batman Beyond) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Should we change the title?[edit]

The name of the article is Bruce Wayne (TV series). Technically, shouldn't it be titled Bruce Wayne (Unmade series)? That sounds more accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.198.33 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a planned "television series". The point of the title is to identify the medium, not what is was or wasn't. The lead sentence identifies that it was never actually made. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did Wikipedia just get used as a source?[edit]

This article, published today, seems to be based on our write-up of the same. Strange? Coincidence? ThuranX (talk) 04:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it was, but it accentuates with a spiked baseball bat how very important it is to be exceptionally careful that everything is cited to a secondary source. Journalists on deadline are notoriously lazy and sloppy. We have no deadlines, and there is no excuse to not source properly, which is why I am as short-tempered as I am when someone fails to do the work.Remember: No Sherlocking, no Original Research. If a citation doesn't exist that says it, it doesn't go in. Full stop. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 04:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]