Talk:Brush Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move, per discussion at Talk:Greektown, Detroit. -- tariqabjotu 06:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Brush Park Historic DistrictBrush Park – While the official name of this district is Brush Park Historic District, the common name is undoubtedly Brush Park. Per WP:COMMONNAME, the name of this article should be Brush Park. Wikipedian77 (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose It appears that all the historic districts in Detroit currently use the phrase "Historic District" in their title, per Category:Historic districts in Detroit, Michigan. You have proposed dropping the words "Historic District" from this and several other article titles, apparently while leaving them in place for the rest. Is there something unique about these specific articles? Personally I don't think setting up occasional exceptions to the norm is the best way to approach this. Perhaps a discussion should be started and a consensus reached at Talk:Detroit about whether to eliminate "historic district" from most or all of these articles, or to keep it in most or all of them. (I say "most or all" because in some cases the phrase may be needed for disambiguation.) --MelanieN (talk) 21:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC) P.S. If you'd like to consolidate this discussion somewhere, please indicate where.[reply]
  • Note: Please see consolidated discussion at Talk:Greektown Historic District. Thank you. Wikipedian77 (talk) 03:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brush Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brush Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]