Talk:Bryant Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBryant Park has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 4, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 18, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that as part of a restoration of New York City's Bryant Park, 84 miles (135 km) of bookshelves were built underneath it?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yunye2017.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Dianehyi, Danielleelbaum.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closure of the Lawn[edit]

10/1/08 Removed the "Closure of the Lawn section." Reason: the article used somewhat accurate information to depict a completely wrong situation. The main reason the Bryant Park lawn is closed is because - it is sod and not a real lawn, such the Central Park lawn - it is incredibly busy, packed with people, and the use generates a lot of stress - it drains poorly, again a condition of the sod and the relatively low-quality dirt under it. Corporate events are in fact prohibited from renting the lawn. Only Fashion Week uses it, because the City of New York allows them to do so, against the wishes of the private management company. They are on record on this topic. So it is in fact he opposite of what was claimed: the public sector (City of New York) is responsible for allowing the 46 days a year closure, not the management company. Finally, it is very likely that the reason PPS put Bryant Park is in its hall of shame is because of the relationship between the principal of that company and that of the Bryant Park Corporation. No visitor of the park would make such an outlandish comment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spqrxxi (talkcontribs) 20:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note the above comment was added by someone who started the page for "Dan Biedermann," the executive in charge of Bryant Park. Seems a blatant conflict of interest, and another example of how the management/PR team in charge of the park manipulates this page, to the extent that the whole article reads like an ad. The issues originally raised in the article were the increasing private use of the park for corporate sponsored events, which occupy the park at the expense of quiet public enjoyment. As a New Yorker I can confirm that the facts in the original edit are true, and in this decade park users have witnessed a steady erosion of Great Lawn time available for use by the public. It's gotten so bad that these days, if you show up with your sandwich during the summer, chances are you either find the Lawn closed, or it's open but there is some noisy event happening on it -- and once the event is over, the lawn closes! Note that the park rep who wrote the above talks about the lawn having drainage problems, which I know from personal experience (a wet behind) is quite true, but that doesn't stop them from allowing Clear Channel, and HBO, and the Yankees, and other big corporations, from using the lawn to shill their wares. This is the situation which was described by the PPS when it put the park into its "Hall of shame" so it's rather a stretch for the BP rep above to claim that the Hall of Shame rating comes just from a clash of personalities! Jewish-wargamer (talk) 17:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation revised[edit]

I have revised the citation for "Bryant Park Today", linking to the more substantive chapter of "The Culture of Cities", which deals with the exclusivity of the redesigned park rather than the intro section in which it is more briefly mentioned.--Coldwater4 (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bryant Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bryant Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Lawn or a Lawn[edit]

New change of "The Lawn" to "The lawn" is very agreeable and better then version "A Lawn". I apologize for my ignorance of the indefinite article. Thank you esteemed editors for this helpful improvements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BryantPark43 (talkcontribs) 15:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pop culture section[edit]

Pasting it here. epicgenius (talk) 23:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I support the commenting out of the pop culture section, there are several issues with this section that need addressed. Hog Farm (talk) 00:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In popular culture

Since its restoration, Bryant Park has been used in several film and television productions:

Films
Television
  • Law & Order is among the television series that use the park for scenes.[6]
  • The final three designers on the fashion design TV show Project Runway would show their final collections during Fashion Week while the event was held in Bryant Park.[7]Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).
Music
  • The Bill Wurtz song I'm in Bryant Park (2014) is about Bryant Park.[8]

References

  1. ^ "Private Parts Film Locations". On the set of New York. July 26, 2013. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
  2. ^ "Ghostbusters film locations (1984)". Movie-locations.com. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
  3. ^ "I Think I Love My Wife Film Locations". On the set of New York. July 26, 2013. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
  4. ^ "Sex and the City Film Locations". On the set of New York. July 26, 2013. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
  5. ^ "Morning Glory Film Locations". On the set of New York. July 26, 2013. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
  6. ^ Law & Order SVU film shoot in Bryant Park on YouTube
  7. ^ "Project Runway strikes out at Bryant Park | Crain's New York Business". Crainsnewyork.com. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
  8. ^ "I'm in Bryant Park", Bill Wurtz, 2014
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bryant Park's lawn
Bryant Park's lawn

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 04:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • A very nice article for a very nice park that was recently promoted to GA (and will probably pass FA IMO). I love the main hook, which is interesting and verified with the supplied source. QPQ is done. The only issue is that the sentence "increased visibility from the street, to enhance the formal French garden design (with a lush redesign by Lynden Miller), and improve and repair paths and lighting." is a bit too close to this source. And why not add a picture? The one in the infobox looks very nice (and I took a few pictures from my last visit that can also be used :-). -Zanhe (talk) 06:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Zanhe: Thanks for the review and for the praise. I did not check the copyvio detector results before, so I have removed the violating phrase. I added a proposed image to this nomination. Feel free to add your own pictures, it's much appreciated and would probably be better than my pictures (and I go here almost every day ). epicgenius (talk) 13:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good to go, and thanks for expanding this article about one of my favorite places in NYC. I always visit the park whenever I'm in the city, but never realized there were so many books under my feet! I'll make sure to flex my newfound knowledge next time I visit NYC with my family or friends :-) -Zanhe (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]