Talk:Buffalo Nine

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Here is a good resource:

[http://books.google.com/books?id=h2Tp9VBvq68C&pg=PA261&lpg=PA261&dq=the+buffalo+nine+vietnam+era&source=web&ots=UB9yCRWLmE&sig=aHsE8Sl6vD459pyC5y68nOkA1fo ]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

The Buffalo Nine.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IF the posting of the Buffalo Nine image violates copyright rules, then it should be speedily deleted. If, however, the pamphlet was in the public domain ninth 1960s sans copyright, then perhaps not. I am currently searching for the original pamphlet of which I have my own copy (currently misplaced) but assume it was produced by the Defense Committee itself an organization of UB SDS at the time. But I , whom posted said image to Wikipedia Commons and then the link on the article, should not be blocked from editing the B9 article. Pittore44 (talk) 07:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I apparently had my permissions restored for Wikipedia Commons : Dear Jerry Ross,

Apologies for your inconvenience. I have verified your user account. Please see <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pittore44>. You may ask for undeletion or restoration of your deleted files at <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests> by placing your request. Please let me know if you want me to do it for you.

Thank you for your contributions to the Wikimedia Commons.

Yours sincerely,

Tulsi Bhagat

This was in regard to this file:

I had attempted to use this in the "External References" section of the Buffalo Nine Article. That is if, I remember correctly. In any event, I would like it restored there, if that is permitted. I will try, today, to edit the Buffalo Nine Article main text to reflect that the Sostre case was contemporaneous with that of the Buffalo Nine and of great significance for the B9 defendants as well as the larger community. Pittore44 (talk) 21:51, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For Tulsi Bhagat: Please do this for me. The Buffalo Nine was an important anti-war case similar in scope to the Chicago 7, and the article, in my opinion, should not be deleted. 2601:1C0:CA02:5AC0:1CA6:516E:842C:88DA (talk) 05:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]