Talk:Bug (2006 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Oklahoma C‑class Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

2006 film or 2007 film?[edit]

IMDb lists this film as 2006 film and it has been shown in numerous film festivals world wide. I am quite new to film categories, but what is the criteria for listing years on films?--Merumerume 03:14, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing they go by when it's released to the public?--DrBat 22:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filming location[edit]

Is the motel where the exteriors are shot a real motel? I assume the highway that passes it is 395? Corvus cornix 23:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. The exteriors are shot in California. Michael Shannon mentions it in a youtube Q&A [1] Bib 00:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right, outside Mammoth. You can see the Los Angeles Aqueduct, or else the Owens River, running right behind the motel in the aerial shots. Corvus cornix 01:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bug 2007 score.jpg[edit]

Image:Bug 2007 score.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB Rating[edit]

It has changed by a whole point. Should we update that info in the article? --luckymustard 22:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yep Bib 22:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

Hola, pido excusas por escribir en español, mi inglés es demasiado incorrecto. Os pido que no modifiqueis en exceso el apartado plot. Es muy interesante y muy instructivo. Gracias.82.198.36.248 13:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section[edit]

I have removed it for now because nowhere in the citations provided does it say Bug is being blamed for the killing. All the articles say is that he saw the movie days before the killing. He might've watched Galaxy Quest the night before on cable, but that doesn't mean it has anything to do with the killing. The UK tabloids tend to sensationalize and rally against films; that doesn't mean Wikipedia should follow suit. --YellowTapedR (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alberto Izaga[edit]

Isn´t this worth mentioning in the article? [2] --85.197.210.44 (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is what YellowTapedR is referring to in "Controversy section", above. There is a similar case in Scientology controversies#Personality tests, where Norwegian newspapers wrote about how a Scientology test made a girl committ suicide. In this case it is English newspapers that write about how the film made a man committ murder. I wrote a whole section called 'controversy', before it was removed by Zzzzqzqzqzzqz in January 2008. This was the section: A 36 year old man, in the UK, beat his two-year-old daughter to death, a few days after he'd watched Bug for the first time. During a visit to New York in May, 2007, he watched Bug with his wife, after they had turned up late for the film they had planned to watch. The couple almost walked out on several occasions, but they sat through it.^[1] On May 29, 2007 at a conference in Geneva, Switzerland, he became fixated on a motivational talk by Mike Horn. After returning to London on June 2, he complained that he had not slept for three days. In the evening, while dining with his family at restaurant, he started talking to himself and gesticulating. At 9pm, he went to bed.^[2] He woke at 4.30am on June 3, and began several hours of insane ramblings. He was ranting about the Geneva presentation, about his mother, about proof that God did not exist, about how a sect were recruiting executives to take over the world, and about Bug. Over the next four hours he became increasingly worked up, bursting into tears and shouting about the film, the Devil and death.^[3] He began hitting the pillows saying he could not sleep. He walked into his daughter's room, and shook her. When she woke up, she started crying. Shortly before he picked her up, he shouted about Bug, and said "I know what I have to do, I have to kill her."^[4] She tried to run, he blocked her path, then smashed her repeatedly on the floor,^[1] while he screamed “Death!” in Spanish.^[2] His daugther was taken to the hospital, but died two days later.^[5] The man, a millionaire, who had been described as a devoted and loving father, was a senior executive at Swiss Re, the world’s largest reinsurer. He has been found not guilty, due to insanity. He had no history of mental illness. It was described as a sudden mental disorder that could strike anyone,^[2]^[4] a sudden acute psychotic and schizophrenic disorder, which took hold of him within a few days.^[2] Bib (talk) 18:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ ^a ^b "Film fixation". Telegraph.co.uk. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d "Insanity of City Boss who Battered Daughter to Death". Daily Express. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)
^ "Millionaire executive unhinged by horror film killed daughter". This is London. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)
^ ^a ^b "Mental breakdown caused father to kill his daughter". The Independent. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)
^ "'Man killed daughter after seeing horror film'". Yorkshire Evening Post. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)

Bilderberg group[edit]

The Bilderberg group that was referenced in the movie is real. They're mentioned in the History channel, reporters have been allowed to attend part of the meetings but never been allowed to speak about what went on. The group is very rich and powerful. They hold a meeting in a different country every year. There first meeting was at the Bilderberg hotel as stated in the movie. There are a few reporters who cover their meetings. Alex Jones is a reporter based in Texas who demonizes the group and claims they are the head of the Illuminati, a secret, demonic global organization which controls politics, religion, and economics, among other things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.83.208 (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really an Oklahoma article?[edit]

I think a film that is set in Oklahoma, but did not actually include footage from Oklahoma may not be something that should really be tagged for the WP Oklahoma project. Thoughts? Okheric (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Plot section - reality or delusion?[edit]

I have edited the plot section to reflect the director's view of the film. William Friedkin's commentary on the DVD release makes it clear that the question of how much is reality and how much is delusion is left deliberately ambiguous: he does not know himself. It is real to the characters, but the two shots within the end credits (the child's toys in the normal room and the body in the foil-covered room) are inconsistent both with each other and the ending of the film (there is no sign of fire damage in either shot). Which is the objectively "real" situation at the end of the film is, by design, unknowable. Lovingboth (talk) 13:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm looking to improve the lead section of this article. Mainly I'm thinking of adding a bit more information about the plot, awards it has won, it's box office success in the US, and other fun facts like that. Please let me know if you have any suggestions! The link to my sandbox is as follow: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KristinaKalergis/sandbox Thanks. KristinaKalergis (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bug (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.startribune.com/1553/story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bug (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bug (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[telegraph-1] "Film fixation". Telegraph.co.uk. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)

[express-2] "Insanity of City Boss who Battered Daughter to Death". Daily Express. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)

[thisislondon-3] "Millionaire executive unhinged by horror film killed daughter". This is London. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)

[independent-4] "Mental breakdown caused father to kill his daughter". The Independent. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)

[yorkshire-5] "'Man killed daughter after seeing horror film'". Yorkshire Evening Post. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |file= ignored (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]