Talk:BuildMaster

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

The CorenSearchBot falsly reported this page as violating copyright.

@Kharnagy: - Yes, the source listed by the SearchBot was text pulled from this article before it was deleted in 2012, so it is not a copyright violation. That, though, brings up another problem. The content of this article is substantively the same as the deleted one (using the copy to compare), so unless the reasons for its original deletion have changed, it will be re-deleted fairly quickly. The deletion discussion was HERE (note, don't make any edits to that page), and it was deleted for lack of Reliable Sources. There was only 1 in the previous version, there are 4 now, but all of them are essentially Primary Sources (the maker, a blog by the maker's company, and a press release from the maker). Please add links to unrelated third-party sources (magazines, newspapers, trade pubs, etc) if possible, otherwise this article is probbaly going to be re-deleted. Electric Wombat (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Electric Wombat: Actual thanks for getting back, I tried to use several other resources from a site called dzone.com as links but they were not allowed. Following up on that I saw the dzone was unallowed by wikipedia, in conjuction with a site called dbzone.com an unconnected site, and that there were several mentions to get dzone back allowed.

Can you offer advice as to how to push that through? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharnagy (talk • contribs) 20:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That domain is on the Global Spam Blacklist, meaning it is blocked from all wikipedias, not just the english one. . I'm not sure why it ended up there, but if you want to discuss with the folks who control that list, you can post [Here] Electric Wombat (talk) 20:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted old AfD as content is now accurately sourced and cited. Kharnagy (talk) 17:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article reads like an advertisement. I think it violates WP:NEUTRAL and possibly WP:CONFLICT. 31.16.154.139 (talk) 10:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]