Talk:Bullbar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Please remove the advertising language. Thank you. Rintrah 16:01, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rintrah, it's not advertising language, it's plain Aussie - we shorten everything down to a syllable or two. I will attempt to make it acceptable to non-Aussies and Aussies alike.Trishm 23:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has addressed my concern; I'm happy. Rintrah 07:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why is this article "within the scope of WikiProject Australia" anyway? Bullbars are common in North America. Australia should be represented, but the topic is not country-specific.

I agree, bullbars are used -or prohibited- all over the World. Milton (talk) 08:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Contestable Claim[edit]

'Although studies have shown bull bars to cause an increase in the risk of death and serious injury to pedestrians,[3] modern energy-absorbent polymer-based designs are less hazardous to pedestrians, with some having been shown to be safer than the same vehicle without a bullbar.'

I'm not sure I agree with that second bit about the polymer based designs... could you please provide us with more legitimate refercences than #4 or #5 (which is, in fact, a broken link)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.188.17 (talk) 01:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While the second of the two references no longer appears to work, the first is still available and is a reliable reference that verifies the statement in the article. There have also been published articles about these moulded polymer bars, which are reliable and verifiable but I don't have any of them to hand right now. --Athol Mullen (talk) 13:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology[edit]

This confusing article seems to be arguing with itself about terminology. The usual term I am familiar with in Australia is "bull bar". (I have only ever heard the term "roo bar" used on UK TV travel shows.) In any event, the article should decribe the concept, not foreground the terminology. However the terminology is brought to the fore, then clarification provided as to what exactly a roo bar might be, yet the article later switches between bull and roo, and thereby seems to contradict itself. Format (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears to be original research because the author seems to have assumed that bull bars are somehow related to push bumpers. Push bumpers are modified bumperettes, which were originally to prevent horizontal bumpers from over-/underriding and locking together on passenger vehicles. Early types were energy-absorbing; later, they became more-decorative and cheaper stamped & chromed; some of those received energy-absorbing rubber pads or points to reduce scuffing during use; then harder plastics with less friction or energy-absorption became standard because they could be molded thinner, cheaper, were more robust, and could be used to hide the bumperette fasteners. All of them are intended for vehicle-to-vehicle contact. But none of that has anything to do with bull bars, which were originally attached to farm implements & vehicles to herd stubborn livestock. Sport off-road vehicles copied that style of front bumper to deal with boulders & trees, which is how brush guards (full-width) & bull bars (smaller, and central) evolved. So bull bars are distinct from push bumpers. My research was done at the D.C. PTO in the mid 90s when I researched "automotive fenders" (bumpers). I can't cite the hundreds of patents I read, but I can confirm that the foam-polymer-clad grille guard patented by Land Rover was found to cause fewer injuries to pedestrians than the same vehicle without the guard, as mentioned on this talk page. Steve8394 (talk) 05:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ban[edit]

The article states that metal bull bars were banned outright by an EU directive, although the sources given are dead. Frontal Protection System implies that metal bull bars are actually subject to an expensive approval procedure that made them economically unviable but not banned; the article ends by saying that this legislation was repeated in November 2009. It seems to have been merged and replaced by another regulation summarised here. The gist of it seems to be that bull bars need type approval. As such it appears that they're not banned in law, but I'm not a lawyer. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Bullbar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bullbar/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Assessment of article completed by Auroranorth on 16 February 2007 for Wikiproject Australia. For any disputes, please talk to me.

Assessor's comments:

A bit disappointed. One contributor said it warranted an upgrade to B-class in the Wikiproject Australia, however this is almost obviously not the case. Auroranorth 11:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 11:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bullbar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bullbar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bullbar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bullbar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bullbar&oldid=1200443008"