Talk:Bulletproof Monk

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Canadian / Comic book / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comics: Films Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Comic book[edit]

Shouldn't this entry be about the comic book and this entry moved to Bulletproof Monk (film)? (Emperor 04:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I don't think so because there is no mention of the comic book and because the film is more well-known than the comic book. --GHcool 04:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The comic book is mentioned in the opening paragraph. There are obviously no other mentions of it because this entry is about the film - which is part of my point (this is hampering the development of an entry on the comic). We need to either make this into an entry on the film (see for example Tank Girl) or make this entry a disambiguation linking to both. (Emperor 16:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

But there is no article about the Bulletproof Monk comic the same way there is about the Tank Girl comic. --GHcool 00:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there were an article about the comic, a disambig link would be appropriate to add here, as the film is the more well-known result. However, as there is (still) no article for it, the mention in the intro is sufficient for now. AnmaFinotera (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

true stories[edit]

thanks to whoever removed that line. anyone who has ever bought hot dogs and buns knows they come in different amounts. it's not a reference to true stories; it's a reference to LIFE.

PA?[edit]

An entry in the MISTAKES section says, "During the fight on the rooftop, when Kar falls over the side of the building, you can see a PA dressed in his traffic gear in the middle of the intersection in the top left corner of the screen." What is a PA? 68.206.134.81 21:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely a production assistant. --GHcool 22:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this film being a satire of the genre itself... 31.220.200.16 (talk) 00:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good review bad review[edit]

While adding reviews I noticed something unusual. The review from Variety magazine[1] is interpreted by Rotten Tomatoes as a rotten or negative review[2]. I would expect Metacritic then to interpret the same review as negative or possibly mixed, but in fact Metacritic sees it as a positive review assigning it 70 out of 100 on their scoring list.[3] I found the discrepancy interesting but ultimately it doesn't make a whole lot of difference, some might wonder the Variety review isn't grouped with the negative reviews, but that's about it. -- 109.78.196.233 (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]