Talk:Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

Wikipedia article about this organization should be about the organization. This is not a forum for posting the platform of the organization.

The section titled "priorities" should be deleted in accordance with this standard. Upon removal of "priorities" section the NEUTRALITY DISPUTED tag can be removed.

If priorities section will remain, it should have references and citations - and the "neutrality disputed" tag should remain as long as this section is included.

Done. - Roy Boy 16:07, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive graph[edit]

We need a new graph. Its caption says it's "discretionary spending" but readers who aren't familiar with that term might get the idea that that's the entire budget. It's a safe bet that most readers will think over 50% of the budget goes to defense.

Perhaps we need two graphs. One to show the full budget, and another to show the propaganda that this organization is trying to push. In that light, we need to list more names of the people behind this.
-- Randy2063 03:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]