Talk:Business routes of U.S. Route 10 in Michigan/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • In the sentence "At Clarabella Road, the business loop crosses from Clare County into Isabella County before crossing under the US 127 freeway without an interchange.", you use the verb cross twice.
    • In the Major intersections table for the Flint business route, the wording "Northern partner of a one-way pairing" and "Southern partner of a one-way pairing" does not sound right. Maybe try something like "Westbound direction of M-21" and "Eastbound direction of M-21" to give the idea M-21 is routed on a one-way pair here.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • The lead is a little short, could provide a brief summary of the description and history of each business route along with some context about US 10 in Michigan.
    • You should mention how many lanes wide the business routes are along with whether or not they are divided.
    • In the prose of the Midland business route, you should mention what county the highway is in before entering Bay County.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Pictures of the business loops would be nice to have. Also, It may help to have a map in the infobox showing where all the business routes of US 10 in Michigan are. However, the lack of neither will hold this article up.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The article seems to be a good model for how lists of bannered routes should be handled. I will put on hold for a few fixes to be made. Dough4872 01:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dough4872: tweaks and additions applied. Imzadi 1979  02:12, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will now pass this article. Dough4872 02:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]