Talk:Busy for Me/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: mauchoeagle (c) 22:35, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- Still reading
- Firstly, why is it "Busy for Me" instead of Busy for Me.
- it was released in 2010 in Portugal to favourable reviews and moderate success., This sentence makes no sense, consider rewording to Great success and exceptional reviews followed the singles 2010 release.
- Most of the references are videos, that have been uploaded by private citizens of some country. According to policy, videos are not reliable unless they have been retrieved directly from a trusted source. This is a key problem and the main reason that I will decline.