Talk:CCIR System B

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Was the System B was the first formal 625-line broadcasting standard in the world?[edit]

The article claims that "System B was the first formal 625-line broadcasting standard in the world." Truthfulness of this statement depends on the meaning of the "first formal standard". It is worth noting that the first 625-line TV format have been adopted as an official state standard (GOST 78-45) in the USSR in 1945. Regular broadcasts in 625-line system (later labeled as CCIR System D) commenced in 1949 in Moscow. Mikus (talk) 23:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article. But that particular statement has been added by User:Steve Hosgood. Unfortunatelly he died in 2014. I think he referred to CCIR rather than the national standards when he stated the first formal standart. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To me "formal standard" is (1) either something standardized by a government body like FCC in the U.S. or ITU in Europe or a Ministry of Communications, or (2) something agreed upon by a consortium of manufacturers, like HDV video (Sony, Canon, JVC, Sharp). To me, "formal standard" does not necessarily presume an international inter-governmental body. I suggest either removing this line from the article or rewriting it in a more specific manner, like "the first international 625-line standard". Mikus (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The revised claim needs to link to a dated document. Also, dated documents for all other 625-line systems must be linked to provide unambiguous evidence of System B being the first international 625-line TV format. Mikus (talk) 00:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CCIR System B. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120830232230/http://www.pembers.freeserve.co.uk:80/World-TV-Standards/Transmission-Systems.html to http://www.pembers.freeserve.co.uk/World-TV-Standards/Transmission-Systems.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]