Talk:CRAAP test

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Things to keep in mind when looking at my draft. -How to improve paragraphs -Sentence structure -Vocabulary variety Sdo1994 (talk) 21:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sdo1994.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Library science image[edit]

Can someone please explain to me how the image currently featured in the article, File:Library science symbol .svg, is actually a depiction of library science? I mean, it is licenced as 'own work' by the uploader. A quick Google search shows other rudimentary designs of a similar nature, but I mean, can we get a source that this is in fact a symbol of library science? Rather than just something fan made. I'm currently seeing insufficient justification to include this image on this article, especially since the caption is simply 'Library science', which is not particularly helpful. I'll remove the image if no-one responds. Damien Linnane (talk) 08:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

in Portuguese:

Paz e bem!
1 O desenho está conforme definição adotada pela Conselho Federal de Biblioteconomia (Brasil)
2 Não fui eu que coloquei este desenho na página CRAAP test.
Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 11:46, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Since this is only the image of one organisation in Brazil, I don't see the relevance for adding it as the lead image to this article, especially without a caption giving indication as to why it is featured here (which wouldn't be justifiable anyway in my opinion). Damien Linnane (talk) 12:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]