Talk:Caldecott Honor

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Libraries Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed Categories?[edit]

So why did this get removed from the Children's Lit category, and is not in the Picture book category?
~ender 2008-11-18 5:10:AM MST —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.240.12.80 (talk)

Merge[edit]

I propose moving this material to the Caldecott Medal page, primarily to make this page more parallel with the Newbery page but also because I think that has become the general standard on most award pages. -ErinHowarth (talk) 07:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 12:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. The Caldecott Honor page is a big mess of red links. The Caldecott Medal page is concise and useful. There is no harm in keeping them apart. They link to each other clearly. --Knulclunk (talk) 05:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The sortable table with the yellow colored cells for winners is inspired. I withdraw my disagreement.--Knulclunk (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Honor page is no longer "a big mess of red links." Do you still oppose the merger? --ErinHowarth (talk) 06:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Just because the "norm" is to put them on one page, it is very helpful to have a page with JUST winners... otherwise you have to print out 9 or 10 pages just to get one page of information.

It is possible to have it both ways. If the table is sortable, you could put all the winners at the top of the page and just print that page. --ErinHowarth (talk) 06:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - to those who have disagreed, you have to see how ErinHowarth has done fantastic work on other pages with these sortable tables. I think once you see that, your objections will dissolve. Go see if you agree. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]