Talk:California State Route 149/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Needs some work.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Some sections are not references (e.g. last sentence in lead)

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Per above

   C. No original research:

   Last sentence in lead ("bottleneck")

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Need some images

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Per above

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Sorry, but this article needs a lot of work before GA. ~~ ĈĠ (☺ - Review!) ^Simple? 14:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

What needs work? You didn't specify any prose issues, the lead does not have to be cited, and images aren't a requirement. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 21:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

This article can be quick-failed since it has an {{expand}}. However, this is an unacceptable review. CG, you need to be specific about the problems that the article has. The comments you made above are unacceptable. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)