Talk:California State Route 149/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
In the History, it describes a past construction project in future tense.
Done. --Rs chen 7754 10:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
In the route description, is it possible to mention how many lanes SR 149 is and whether or not it is a divided highway?

It apparently is a divided highway; can't say much more than that. --Rs chen 7754 09:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source found for lanes. --Rs chen 7754 08:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of rural features does it pass? Farms? Woods?

Not done; I think the article's specific enough. --Rs chen 7754 09:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the route description, indicate the termini are interchanges.

Done. --Rs chen 7754 22:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for some minor fixes. Dough 48 72 02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to need at least a few days. I just noticed that there are some dead links that need to be dealt with. --Rs chen 7754 22:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I tried to get the dead links resolved; one remains. Got everything else except for one that I disagree with. --Rs chen 7754 08:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once the remaining dead links are taken care of I will pass the article. Dough 48 72 19:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, according to the external links too these links are dead but they came up for me. Therefore, I will pass the article. Dough 48 72 20:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]